Development Management Development Plan (DPD)

Comment

Representation ID: 1250

Received: 10/08/2010

Respondent: Iceni Projects

As such, wholesale changes will be required to the housing strategy to maintain a five and fifteen year supply of suitable, available and viable housing sites. It is significant that there has been growing concern amongst Council Members over town cramming and the provision of a large predominance of flatted developments. The changes to PPS3 do allow the Council to apply greater freedoms in the types and standards of housing (size and densities) sought, provided there is sufficient additional land supply identified to address these improved standards.

Comment

Representation ID: 1251

Received: 10/08/2010

Respondent: Iceni Projects

As clarified below, the current market demand, in Southend and the wider area, is now predominantly for family sized homes. Therefore, the logical conclusion arising from both of the changes to PPS3 is the need to identify further reservoirs of housing land to allow for sufficient housing growth of the dwelling type/s demanded without the comfort of delivery on windfall sites or minimum targets on those areas identified.

Comment

Representation ID: 1252

Received: 10/08/2010

Respondent: Iceni Projects

With the recent changes to PPS3 in mind, it is relevant to note the findings of the Inspector and Secretary of State in relation to the evidence presented by the appellant regarding the likelihood of high density flatted development schemes being delivered in the current economic climate, specifically in relation to the south Essex sub-region, at the recent appeal by Colonnade for the development of approximately 300 dwellings in East Tilbury (ref. APP/M9565/A/09/2114804/NWF). Evidence was presented by a former Managing Director of a national housebuilder with a significant property portfolio in south Essex, which confirmed that, amongst other issues: * Delivery of new housing in South Essex in recent years has, as a result of buoyant market conditions, limited supply, and vendor expectations, been focussed on flatted development as this was seen by investors as the way to maximise the value of their land; * Following the downturn in the economy, there has been a realisation that high density schemes, unless of a scale and location that are highly sustainable and desirable, are not economically deliverable in the short or medium term; * Planning supply of flatted product suddenly became the opposite of what little end user demand existed for traditional family housing; * In some cases the financial viability of high density schemes that also had high planning gain tariffs, sustainability codes and contemporary design costs was in question even at the height of the market. Due to the financial difficulty being experienced by all house builders at present, the emphasis is on securing land that has the ability to generate turnover with low working capital expenditure. In order to achieve this, the focus is on securing relatively 'clean' land for building and selling family housing product rather than flats, which are less dependent on off-market sales and the buy-to-let investor market.The Inspector's Report confirmed that the above evidence was accepted in making his recommendation that the appeal be allowed. In addition, the Inspector acknowledged the "delivery problems arising in the current economic climate, and from the heavy reliance on the delivery of high density urban development on complex brownfield sites" [IR334] and noted that: "More recently, the additional cost associated with major brownfield schemes has in some cases seen the proportion of affordable housing renegotiated downwards. An example is the Fiddler's Reach scheme at West Thurrock, where viability considerations have restricted the proportion of affordable housing to 11%." [IR308]. It is quite clear from the above, that a heavy reliance on the delivery of housing development on high density brownfield sites brings with it a number of significant complexities, not least the issues of attractiveness to the market and viability, but also the potential to restrict affordable housing delivery, both in real and proportional terms. In accepting the recommendation of the Inspector and allowing the appeal, the Secretary of State verified position adopted by the Inspector and should be taken into account by the Council in the formulation of the policies of the DMD and SCAAP.

Comment

Representation ID: 1253

Received: 10/08/2010

Respondent: Iceni Projects

The proposed approach to a number of the issues contained within the DMD will need to be reconsidered in light of the announcements by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and the Minister for Decentralisation. Specifically, the following issues will need to be considered: