Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Search representations
Results for Planning Perspectives LLP search
New searchComment
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
80. Do you consider the alternative option to be more appropriate? If so, please state why.
Representation ID: 708
Received: 09/08/2010
Respondent: Planning Perspectives LLP
Issue DM21 seeks the maintenance and supply of modern employment floorspace at Shoebury Garrison within a mixed-use context. A flexible managed approach is encouraged through the use of Planning Briefs. Historically, the site has been allocated for Employment Use and benefits from an extant outline planning permission for Bl(a) Office use and Bl(b) Research and Development. On this basis, the site has been marketed for sale for a significant period with little interest. Indeed, the recently published Employment Land Review (May 2010) (paragraph 6.8) acknowledges that "... in the medium term to 2021 there is significantly lower demand for employment land in this location.
Comment
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
80. Do you consider the alternative option to be more appropriate? If so, please state why.
Representation ID: 709
Received: 09/08/2010
Respondent: Planning Perspectives LLP
It is suggested that the site does not present a suitable opportunity for employment use, given its geographical location within the Borough and the poor transport links connecting the site to the rest of the Borough and beyond. Interest has been expressed in the site for residential development and as such a residential lead scheme should be considered in this location. Shoebury Garrison should be removed from Issue DM21 and identified as a residential lead development site. The site provides the potential to build on the existing residential development that has come forward as part of the outline planning permission and provides a suitable opportunity to contribute to Southend's housing targets as a windfall site.
Comment
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
81. Are there any other issues relating to the industrial and employment areas that should be considered?
Representation ID: 1264
Received: 09/08/2010
Respondent: Planning Perspectives LLP
Please accept these comments in response to the current consultation for the Southend-on-Sea Development Management DPD. The comments are made in respect of Shoebury Garrison, Shoeburyness. Issue DM21 seeks the maintenance and supply of modern employment floorspace at Shoebury Garrison within a mixed-use context. A flexible managed approach is encouraged through the use of Planning Briefs. Historically, the site has been allocated for Employment Use and benefits from an extant outline planning permission for Bl(a) Office use and Bl(b) Research and Development. On this basis, the site has been marketed for sale for a significant period with little interest. Indeed, the recently published Employment Land Review (May 2010) (paragraph 6.8) acknowledges that "... in the medium term to 2021 there is significantly lower demand for employment land in this location. It is suggested that the site does not present a suitable opportunity for employment use, given its geographical location within the Borough and the poor transport links connecting the site to the rest of the Borough and beyond. Interest has been expressed in the site for residential development and as such a residential lead scheme should be considered in this location. Shoebury Garrison should be removed from Issue DM21 and identified as a residential lead development site. The site provides the potential to build on the existing residential development that has come forward as part of the outline planning permission and provides a suitable opportunity to contribute to Southend's housing targets as a windfall site.