Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Search representations
Results for Renaissance Southend Ltd search
New searchComment
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
33. Do you agree with the suggested option?
Representation ID: 670
Received: 09/08/2010
Respondent: Renaissance Southend Ltd
There should be a clear link in the policy to more detailed proposals to be contained within the Greenspace and Green Grid Strategy SPD
Comment
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
72b If so do you think the proportion should be 20%, 30% or other? Alternatively do you think there should be no retail protection?
Representation ID: 671
Received: 09/08/2010
Respondent: Renaissance Southend Ltd
That part of the policy relating to the town centre should be informed by the evidence of the Retail Study commissioned by the Council and a more sophisticated development control policy may be needed to implement the preferred policy for the High Street may be required in the SCAAP rather than DM DPD.
Support
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
75. Do you agree with the suggested option?
Representation ID: 672
Received: 09/08/2010
Respondent: Renaissance Southend Ltd
Renaissance Southend strongly supports the suggested option and the identifies employment sectors. These should be further tested through the Local Economic Assessment before the policy is finalised.
Further work should be done with Southend Hospital Trust to identify how best to support this sector in spatial terms before the policy is finalised.
Support
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
79. Do you agree with the suggested option?
Representation ID: 673
Received: 09/08/2010
Respondent: Renaissance Southend Ltd
Renaissance Southend supports the principle of a managed approach to the existing industrial estates but would recommend that Progress Road be included within Group 1 rather than Group 2 as it is not considered that Progress Road is suitable for a mixed used development and the flexibility on uses implied for Group 2 is inappropriate for Progress Road which should remain in employment and commercial use.
Comment
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
97. Have all the sustainable transport management issues that affect new developments been considered and are there any other transport issues that need to be addressed?
Representation ID: 674
Received: 09/08/2010
Respondent: Renaissance Southend Ltd
Unable to to submit comments on DM27 but would support intention to distinguish between CSAAP area and rest of Borough. May need to retain additional flexibility to respond to individual issues on major town centre sites and to take account of overall policy for town centre parking provision publicly available off street and on-street spaces.
