Development Management - Proposed Submission
Search representations
Results for Orchard Street Investment Management LLP search
New searchObject
Development Management - Proposed Submission
Policy DM13 - Southend-on-Sea Town Centre
Representation ID: 1177
Received: 21/04/2011
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Gerald Eve LLP
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
It is considered that Policy DM13 it is not adequately 'justified', as it is considered not to provide the most appropriate strategy for Southend Town Centre; and is not sufficiently 'effective' as it fails to provide adequate flexibility. As it is contended that the draft policy fails both of these tests of soundness (as identified by PPS 12: Local Spatial Planning), the policy is seen to be unsound in its current form.
Object
Development Management - Proposed Submission
Policy DM14 - Shopping Frontage Management
Representation ID: 1178
Received: 21/04/2011
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Gerald Eve LLP
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
It is considered that Policy DM14 is not adequately 'justified', as it is considered not to provide the most appropriate strategy to reinforce the attractiveness, vitality and viability of the primary and secondary frontages within Southend-on-Sea within the daytime and night-time economies; and is not sufficiently 'effective' as it fails to provide adequate flexibility. As it is contended that the draft policy fails both of these tests of soundness (as identified by PPS 12: Local Spatial Planning), the policy is seen to be unsound in its current form.
Object
Development Management - Proposed Submission
Policy DM13 - Southend-on-Sea Town Centre
Representation ID: 1420
Received: 21/04/2011
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Gerald Eve LLP
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
To enable Southend town centre to remain the first preference and focus for all forms of retail development, it is essential that retail uses are complemented by supporting uses, in line with PPS6, which generate linked trips and allow shoppers to spend more time in the town centre. There to be significant opportunity to deliver new restaurants and cafés in particular.
Object
Development Management - Proposed Submission
Policy DM13 - Southend-on-Sea Town Centre
Representation ID: 1421
Received: 21/04/2011
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Gerald Eve LLP
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
In order to maintain the primacy of the town centre, it is also essential that it remains accessible by a range of transport modes. Travel by car remains the only viable mode of transport for a number of people travelling to Southend town centre. Providing sufficient car parking is therefore a vital component in delivering a successful town centre, especially given pressures from out of town retail centres. Accordingly, it is requested that Policy DM13 explicitly acknowledges the important role car parking has in the function of the town centre and prevents any net loss in public car parking spaces.
Object
Development Management - Proposed Submission
Policy DM13 - Southend-on-Sea Town Centre
Representation ID: 1422
Received: 21/04/2011
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Gerald Eve LLP
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
In light of the key role that The Royals and The Victoria shopping centres have in promoting the vitality and viability of the town centre, it is essential that this is explicitly recognised by Local Development Plan policy contained in the Development Management DPD, which should define a facilitative and flexible approach to support development of both centres throughout the plan period. It is made all the more essential in the face of direct competition from the large out-of-town retail park to be developed at Fossett's Farm.
Object
Development Management - Proposed Submission
Policy DM14 - Shopping Frontage Management
Representation ID: 1423
Received: 21/04/2011
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Gerald Eve LLP
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Adequate flexibility is important in planning policy to ensure complementary non-retail uses are able to develop in the town centre. An arbitrarily-defined restriction on the proportion of units within the primary shopping area's ground floor frontage allowed to be in non-Class A1 (retail) use is unnecessarily. This could actually harm the attractiveness, vitality and viability town centre and will be made more problematic by the retail development at Fossetts Farm. To recognise the need for adequate flexibility the requirement for active shopfronts to be retained or provided in primary and secondary shopping frontages, should instead refer to active frontages.
Object
Development Management - Proposed Submission
Policy DM14 - Shopping Frontage Management
Representation ID: 1424
Received: 21/04/2011
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Gerald Eve LLP
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to the protection of traditional features and shopfronts from being developed in all circumstances, as proposed by the policy. The value of preserving traditional features and shopfronts must be weighed against the benefits associated with any proposals that necessitate their loss. Such a restriction could potentially hold back development of the town centre and impinge on its ability to compete with nearby centres and the out-of-town retail park to be developed at Fossett's Farm.
Object
Development Management - Proposed Submission
Policy DM14 - Shopping Frontage Management
Representation ID: 1425
Received: 21/04/2011
Respondent: Orchard Street Investment Management LLP
Agent: Gerald Eve LLP
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Whilst support is expressed for draft policy DM14's encouragement of the display of local art within the windows of the empty shop units, it is requested that Poicy DM14 is more facilitative by allowing landowners to agree the content of local art to be displayed upfront; and be more relaxed in terms of requiring landowners to apply for planning permission only where proposals cannot be agreed informally.