Comment
Design and Townscape Guide - Refresh 2009 (Consultation Draft)
Representation ID: 38
Received: 03/06/2009
Respondent: Mr J C Gibb
Representation Summary:
Paragraph 141 I am not sure that this reads correctly as the last sentence can be read two ways! In any event the size of house to protect should be raised. It is also important to have a presumption in favour of retention of houses generally as these are increasingly in demand and new building does not reflect what is required.
Full text:
The draft generally represents a step in the right direction. It may however be the case that there is still insufficient weight behind some of the core principles especially limiting climate change, preserving the Green Belt and producing a desirable environment to live in.