Design and Townscape Guide - Refresh 2009 (Consultation Draft)

2.3.2.3 Noise: Point 83
Consideration should be given to adding a further sentence: Noise caused by new development or that will be suffered by the development due to adjoining land uses should be considered at the design stage. Some developments may not be possible if there is an unresolvable noise conflict between adjoining land uses.
5.1.5.1 New Public Roads
Consideration should be given to mentioning the need for a noise assessment in respect of new roads with high traffic flows.
5.1.6.2 Ventilation, Air Handling Equipment and other Plant
314. In addition to odour and fumes etc. it is suggested that dust and particulates are added.
5.2.1 Amenity Space
Consideration should be given to including a comment that amenity space should not normally be provided in situations where the outdoor noise level exceeds World Health Organisation guideline values and there is no option for noise mitigation.
Conversion of Garages to Habitable Rooms
341. consideration should be given to seeking comment from Private Sector Housing Act
346. Noise levels to balconies should not normally exceed World Health Organisation Guideline values for outdoor areas.
5.3.1 Site Layout
361. Consider amending 'A perimeter block can screen nuisance and noise from neighbours'. To read as: 'A perimeter block may form part of a comprehensive noise mitigation scheme to protect the amenity of residential properties.' A scheme would normally be prepared by a competent acoustic consultant.
5.3.4 Servicing
371. Consider amending deliveries should be timed to cause the minimum of inconvenience to other highway users by adding the words 'and residential properties'. Concern is the noise from deliveries.
372. Consider adding after transport assessment the words 'and will not cause adverse impact on the amenity of residential properties'.
373. Consider adding the question of whether the extension will cause adverse impact on residential amenity should be considered.
381. Regarding shop windows and doorways, consider adding the comment 'that light spillage from shop frontages should not adversely impact on residential amenity.
Page 96. 'Pavement Cafes' consider adding the point 'Pavement cafes should not be provided in locations where there will be an adverse impact on residential amenity'.
Page 97. 'Shelters and Compounds for Smokers' please consider adding the further point 'The shelters and compounds should not be provided where they will adversely impact on residential amenity.
Section 5: Check List page 101
Private Amenity Space:
Are the Amenity Spaces Located where they will not be adversely Impacted by Noise from Adjoining Sources such as Roads and Commercial/industrial premises.
Non Residential Schemes:
Page 102. Consider adding the comment 'Does the scheme have an adverse impact on residential amenity'.
6.3.12 Contaminated Land Assessment
440. Consider adding 'The assessment should have regard to the latest edition of the Essex Contaminated Land Consortium Guidance for applicants and developers'.
6.3.13 Noise Assessment
441. Consideration should be given to adding the term 'Detriment to amenity' in addition to noise nuisance. It is understood that avoidance of detriment to amenity is the standard to aim for as regards development subject to planning applications and that this is a higher standard than would be applied if the term nuisance is used.
442. Consider using the following wording 'A noise impact assessment should be submitted for all applications where noise impact on residential amenity may be consideration e.g for sites adjacent to a railway line, a main road, MOD testing area, commercial and industrial developments, and new sporting facilities'
Consider adding a further Section headed 'Artificial Lighting Assessment'. A lighting assessment would be required for developments that have the potential to cause adverse impact on residential amenity such as the flood lighting of sports pitches.
6.3.13 Noise Assessment
The comment for further details see PPG 24: Planning and Noise which can be viewed at www.communities.gov.uk and Environmental Health Guidance - Environmental Noise Impact Residential Developments needs amendment. Please delete 'Environmental Health Guidance - Environmental Noise Impact Residential Developments' and insert 'Guidance by regarding the content of noise impact assessments and criteria sought may be obtained from the Council's Environmental Protection Section via telephone number (01702) 215811.
6.3.17 Lighting Strategy
Please consider adding a comment that the lighting strategy should demonstrate that the proposals will not have an adverse impact on residental amenity.
On page 37 after last paragraph there is a referene to 'see also Environmental Health Guidance-Creation of Residential Dwellings'. I assume this document was produced by private sector housing (PSH), it is recommended that the PSH section is consulted to make sure this advice is current if this has not already been done.
Appendix 5: Code for Sustainable Homes Assessment Criteria
Under the issue 'Construction Site Impacts' in the assessment critera no mention is made of noise control. Suggest the following point is added:
....Adopt best practice policies in respect of noise control including hours of work.
Appendix 6: Options for Resource Minimisation and Development
Under the Option 'Live/work units' in the 'Comments' column consideration should be given to making the comment that only work activities with no impact on the amenity of adjoining residential units would be suitable for these type of units.
Appendix 7: Options for Renewable Power Generation Development
In the option column 'Small Wind Turbine' is noted. In the comments column consideration should be given to making the comment that noise and vibration issues should be considered in respect of the installation of these units.
It is noted that there is an option column referring to 'Wood pellet stoves and boilers'. In the comments column it is suggested that a comment is added regarding the location of the flue and the surroundings and the adequacy of the chimney height in relation to the potential for problems due to odour emissions.

2.3.2.3 Noise: Point 83
Consideration should be given to adding a further sentence: Noise caused by new development or that will be suffered by the development due to adjoining land uses should be considered at the design stage. Some developments may not be possible if there is an unresolvable noise conflict between adjoining land uses.
5.1.5.1 New Public Roads
Consideration should be given to mentioning the need for a noise assessment in respect of new roads with high traffic flows.
5.1.6.2 Ventilation, Air Handling Equipment and other Plant
314. In addition to odour and fumes etc. it is suggested that dust and particulates are added.
5.2.1 Amenity Space
Consideration should be given to including a comment that amenity space should not normally be provided in situations where the outdoor noise level exceeds World Health Organisation guideline values and there is no option for noise mitigation.
Conversion of Garages to Habitable Rooms
341. consideration should be given to seeking comment from Private Sector Housing Act
346. Noise levels to balconies should not normally exceed World Health Organisation Guideline values for outdoor areas.
5.3.1 Site Layout
361. Consider amending 'A perimeter block can screen nuisance and noise from neighbours'. To read as: 'A perimeter block may form part of a comprehensive noise mitigation scheme to protect the amenity of residential properties.' A scheme would normally be prepared by a competent acoustic consultant.
5.3.4 Servicing
371. Consider amending deliveries should be timed to cause the minimum of inconvenience to other highway users by adding the words 'and residential properties'. Concern is the noise from deliveries.
372. Consider adding after transport assessment the words 'and will not cause adverse impact on the amenity of residential properties'.
373. Consider adding the question of whether the extension will cause adverse impact on residential amenity should be considered.
381. Regarding shop windows and doorways, consider adding the comment 'that light spillage from shop frontages should not adversely impact on residential amenity.
Page 96. 'Pavement Cafes' consider adding the point 'Pavement cafes should not be provided in locations where there will be an adverse impact on residential amenity'.
Page 97. 'Shelters and Compounds for Smokers' please consider adding the further point 'The shelters and compounds should not be provided where they will adversely impact on residential amenity.
Section 5: Check List page 101
Private Amenity Space:
Are the Amenity Spaces Located where they will not be adversely Impacted by Noise from Adjoining Sources such as Roads and Commercial/industrial premises.
Non Residential Schemes:
Page 102. Consider adding the comment 'Does the scheme have an adverse impact on residential amenity'.
6.3.12 Contaminated Land Assessment
440. Consider adding 'The assessment should have regard to the latest edition of the Essex Contaminated Land Consortium Guidance for applicants and developers'.
6.3.13 Noise Assessment
441. Consideration should be given to adding the term 'Detriment to amenity' in addition to noise nuisance. It is understood that avoidance of detriment to amenity is the standard to aim for as regards development subject to planning applications and that this is a higher standard than would be applied if the term nuisance is used.
442. Consider using the following wording 'A noise impact assessment should be submitted for all applications where noise impact on residential amenity may be consideration e.g for sites adjacent to a railway line, a main road, MOD testing area, commercial and industrial developments, and new sporting facilities'
Consider adding a further Section headed 'Artificial Lighting Assessment'. A lighting assessment would be required for developments that have the potential to cause adverse impact on residential amenity such as the flood lighting of sports pitches.
6.3.13 Noise Assessment
The comment for further details see PPG 24: Planning and Noise which can be viewed at www.communities.gov.uk and Environmental Health Guidance - Environmental Noise Impact Residential Developments needs amendment. Please delete 'Environmental Health Guidance - Environmental Noise Impact Residential Developments' and insert 'Guidance by regarding the content of noise impact assessments and criteria sought may be obtained from the Council's Environmental Protection Section via telephone number (01702) 215811.
6.3.17 Lighting Strategy
Please consider adding a comment that the lighting strategy should demonstrate that the proposals will not have an adverse impact on residental amenity.
On page 37 after last paragraph there is a referene to 'see also Environmental Health Guidance-Creation of Residential Dwellings'. I assume this document was produced by private sector housing (PSH), it is recommended that the PSH section is consulted to make sure this advice is current if this has not already been done.
Appendix 5: Code for Sustainable Homes Assessment Criteria
Under the issue 'Construction Site Impacts' in the assessment critera no mention is made of noise control. Suggest the following point is added:
....Adopt best practice policies in respect of noise control including hours of work.
Appendix 6: Options for Resource Minimisation and Development
Under the Option 'Live/work units' in the 'Comments' column consideration should be given to making the comment that only work activities with no impact on the amenity of adjoining residential units would be suitable for these type of units.
Appendix 7: Options for Renewable Power Generation Development
In the option column 'Small Wind Turbine' is noted. In the comments column consideration should be given to making the comment that noise and vibration issues should be considered in respect of the installation of these units.
It is noted that there is an option column referring to 'Wood pellet stoves and boilers'. In the comments column it is suggested that a comment is added regarding the location of the flue and the surroundings and the adequacy of the chimney height in relation to the potential for problems due to odour emissions.

2.3.2.3 Noise: Point 83
Consideration should be given to adding a further sentence: Noise caused by new development or that will be suffered by the development due to adjoining land uses should be considered at the design stage. Some developments may not be possible if there is an unresolvable noise conflict between adjoining land uses.
5.1.5.1 New Public Roads
Consideration should be given to mentioning the need for a noise assessment in respect of new roads with high traffic flows.
5.1.6.2 Ventilation, Air Handling Equipment and other Plant
314. In addition to odour and fumes etc. it is suggested that dust and particulates are added.
5.2.1 Amenity Space
Consideration should be given to including a comment that amenity space should not normally be provided in situations where the outdoor noise level exceeds World Health Organisation guideline values and there is no option for noise mitigation.
Conversion of Garages to Habitable Rooms
341. consideration should be given to seeking comment from Private Sector Housing Act
346. Noise levels to balconies should not normally exceed World Health Organisation Guideline values for outdoor areas.
5.3.1 Site Layout
361. Consider amending 'A perimeter block can screen nuisance and noise from neighbours'. To read as: 'A perimeter block may form part of a comprehensive noise mitigation scheme to protect the amenity of residential properties.' A scheme would normally be prepared by a competent acoustic consultant.
5.3.4 Servicing
371. Consider amending deliveries should be timed to cause the minimum of inconvenience to other highway users by adding the words 'and residential properties'. Concern is the noise from deliveries.
372. Consider adding after transport assessment the words 'and will not cause adverse impact on the amenity of residential properties'.
373. Consider adding the question of whether the extension will cause adverse impact on residential amenity should be considered.
381. Regarding shop windows and doorways, consider adding the comment 'that light spillage from shop frontages should not adversely impact on residential amenity.
Page 96. 'Pavement Cafes' consider adding the point 'Pavement cafes should not be provided in locations where there will be an adverse impact on residential amenity'.
Page 97. 'Shelters and Compounds for Smokers' please consider adding the further point 'The shelters and compounds should not be provided where they will adversely impact on residential amenity.
Section 5: Check List page 101
Private Amenity Space:
Are the Amenity Spaces Located where they will not be adversely Impacted by Noise from Adjoining Sources such as Roads and Commercial/industrial premises.
Non Residential Schemes:
Page 102. Consider adding the comment 'Does the scheme have an adverse impact on residential amenity'.
6.3.12 Contaminated Land Assessment
440. Consider adding 'The assessment should have regard to the latest edition of the Essex Contaminated Land Consortium Guidance for applicants and developers'.
6.3.13 Noise Assessment
441. Consideration should be given to adding the term 'Detriment to amenity' in addition to noise nuisance. It is understood that avoidance of detriment to amenity is the standard to aim for as regards development subject to planning applications and that this is a higher standard than would be applied if the term nuisance is used.
442. Consider using the following wording 'A noise impact assessment should be submitted for all applications where noise impact on residential amenity may be consideration e.g for sites adjacent to a railway line, a main road, MOD testing area, commercial and industrial developments, and new sporting facilities'
Consider adding a further Section headed 'Artificial Lighting Assessment'. A lighting assessment would be required for developments that have the potential to cause adverse impact on residential amenity such as the flood lighting of sports pitches.
6.3.13 Noise Assessment
The comment for further details see PPG 24: Planning and Noise which can be viewed at www.communities.gov.uk and Environmental Health Guidance - Environmental Noise Impact Residential Developments needs amendment. Please delete 'Environmental Health Guidance - Environmental Noise Impact Residential Developments' and insert 'Guidance by regarding the content of noise impact assessments and criteria sought may be obtained from the Council's Environmental Protection Section via telephone number (01702) 215811.
6.3.17 Lighting Strategy
Please consider adding a comment that the lighting strategy should demonstrate that the proposals will not have an adverse impact on residental amenity.
On page 37 after last paragraph there is a referene to 'see also Environmental Health Guidance-Creation of Residential Dwellings'. I assume this document was produced by private sector housing (PSH), it is recommended that the PSH section is consulted to make sure this advice is current if this has not already been done.
Appendix 5: Code for Sustainable Homes Assessment Criteria
Under the issue 'Construction Site Impacts' in the assessment critera no mention is made of noise control. Suggest the following point is added:
....Adopt best practice policies in respect of noise control including hours of work.
Appendix 6: Options for Resource Minimisation and Development
Under the Option 'Live/work units' in the 'Comments' column consideration should be given to making the comment that only work activities with no impact on the amenity of adjoining residential units would be suitable for these type of units.
Appendix 7: Options for Renewable Power Generation Development
In the option column 'Small Wind Turbine' is noted. In the comments column consideration should be given to making the comment that noise and vibration issues should be considered in respect of the installation of these units.
It is noted that there is an option column referring to 'Wood pellet stoves and boilers'. In the comments column it is suggested that a comment is added regarding the location of the flue and the surroundings and the adequacy of the chimney height in relation to the potential for problems due to odour emissions.

2.3.2.3 Noise: Point 83
Consideration should be given to adding a further sentence: Noise caused by new development or that will be suffered by the development due to adjoining land uses should be considered at the design stage. Some developments may not be possible if there is an unresolvable noise conflict between adjoining land uses.
5.1.5.1 New Public Roads
Consideration should be given to mentioning the need for a noise assessment in respect of new roads with high traffic flows.
5.1.6.2 Ventilation, Air Handling Equipment and other Plant
314. In addition to odour and fumes etc. it is suggested that dust and particulates are added.
5.2.1 Amenity Space
Consideration should be given to including a comment that amenity space should not normally be provided in situations where the outdoor noise level exceeds World Health Organisation guideline values and there is no option for noise mitigation.
Conversion of Garages to Habitable Rooms
341. consideration should be given to seeking comment from Private Sector Housing Act
346. Noise levels to balconies should not normally exceed World Health Organisation Guideline values for outdoor areas.
5.3.1 Site Layout
361. Consider amending 'A perimeter block can screen nuisance and noise from neighbours'. To read as: 'A perimeter block may form part of a comprehensive noise mitigation scheme to protect the amenity of residential properties.' A scheme would normally be prepared by a competent acoustic consultant.
5.3.4 Servicing
371. Consider amending deliveries should be timed to cause the minimum of inconvenience to other highway users by adding the words 'and residential properties'. Concern is the noise from deliveries.
372. Consider adding after transport assessment the words 'and will not cause adverse impact on the amenity of residential properties'.
373. Consider adding the question of whether the extension will cause adverse impact on residential amenity should be considered.
381. Regarding shop windows and doorways, consider adding the comment 'that light spillage from shop frontages should not adversely impact on residential amenity.
Page 96. 'Pavement Cafes' consider adding the point 'Pavement cafes should not be provided in locations where there will be an adverse impact on residential amenity'.
Page 97. 'Shelters and Compounds for Smokers' please consider adding the further point 'The shelters and compounds should not be provided where they will adversely impact on residential amenity.
Section 5: Check List page 101
Private Amenity Space:
Are the Amenity Spaces Located where they will not be adversely Impacted by Noise from Adjoining Sources such as Roads and Commercial/industrial premises.
Non Residential Schemes:
Page 102. Consider adding the comment 'Does the scheme have an adverse impact on residential amenity'.
6.3.12 Contaminated Land Assessment
440. Consider adding 'The assessment should have regard to the latest edition of the Essex Contaminated Land Consortium Guidance for applicants and developers'.
6.3.13 Noise Assessment
441. Consideration should be given to adding the term 'Detriment to amenity' in addition to noise nuisance. It is understood that avoidance of detriment to amenity is the standard to aim for as regards development subject to planning applications and that this is a higher standard than would be applied if the term nuisance is used.
442. Consider using the following wording 'A noise impact assessment should be submitted for all applications where noise impact on residential amenity may be consideration e.g for sites adjacent to a railway line, a main road, MOD testing area, commercial and industrial developments, and new sporting facilities'
Consider adding a further Section headed 'Artificial Lighting Assessment'. A lighting assessment would be required for developments that have the potential to cause adverse impact on residential amenity such as the flood lighting of sports pitches.
6.3.13 Noise Assessment
The comment for further details see PPG 24: Planning and Noise which can be viewed at www.communities.gov.uk and Environmental Health Guidance - Environmental Noise Impact Residential Developments needs amendment. Please delete 'Environmental Health Guidance - Environmental Noise Impact Residential Developments' and insert 'Guidance by regarding the content of noise impact assessments and criteria sought may be obtained from the Council's Environmental Protection Section via telephone number (01702) 215811.
6.3.17 Lighting Strategy
Please consider adding a comment that the lighting strategy should demonstrate that the proposals will not have an adverse impact on residental amenity.
On page 37 after last paragraph there is a referene to 'see also Environmental Health Guidance-Creation of Residential Dwellings'. I assume this document was produced by private sector housing (PSH), it is recommended that the PSH section is consulted to make sure this advice is current if this has not already been done.
Appendix 5: Code for Sustainable Homes Assessment Criteria
Under the issue 'Construction Site Impacts' in the assessment critera no mention is made of noise control. Suggest the following point is added:
....Adopt best practice policies in respect of noise control including hours of work.
Appendix 6: Options for Resource Minimisation and Development
Under the Option 'Live/work units' in the 'Comments' column consideration should be given to making the comment that only work activities with no impact on the amenity of adjoining residential units would be suitable for these type of units.
Appendix 7: Options for Renewable Power Generation Development
In the option column 'Small Wind Turbine' is noted. In the comments column consideration should be given to making the comment that noise and vibration issues should be considered in respect of the installation of these units.
It is noted that there is an option column referring to 'Wood pellet stoves and boilers'. In the comments column it is suggested that a comment is added regarding the location of the flue and the surroundings and the adequacy of the chimney height in relation to the potential for problems due to odour emissions.

2.3.2.3 Noise: Point 83
Consideration should be given to adding a further sentence: Noise caused by new development or that will be suffered by the development due to adjoining land uses should be considered at the design stage. Some developments may not be possible if there is an unresolvable noise conflict between adjoining land uses.
5.1.5.1 New Public Roads
Consideration should be given to mentioning the need for a noise assessment in respect of new roads with high traffic flows.
5.1.6.2 Ventilation, Air Handling Equipment and other Plant
314. In addition to odour and fumes etc. it is suggested that dust and particulates are added.
5.2.1 Amenity Space
Consideration should be given to including a comment that amenity space should not normally be provided in situations where the outdoor noise level exceeds World Health Organisation guideline values and there is no option for noise mitigation.
Conversion of Garages to Habitable Rooms
341. consideration should be given to seeking comment from Private Sector Housing Act
346. Noise levels to balconies should not normally exceed World Health Organisation Guideline values for outdoor areas.
5.3.1 Site Layout
361. Consider amending 'A perimeter block can screen nuisance and noise from neighbours'. To read as: 'A perimeter block may form part of a comprehensive noise mitigation scheme to protect the amenity of residential properties.' A scheme would normally be prepared by a competent acoustic consultant.
5.3.4 Servicing
371. Consider amending deliveries should be timed to cause the minimum of inconvenience to other highway users by adding the words 'and residential properties'. Concern is the noise from deliveries.
372. Consider adding after transport assessment the words 'and will not cause adverse impact on the amenity of residential properties'.
373. Consider adding the question of whether the extension will cause adverse impact on residential amenity should be considered.
381. Regarding shop windows and doorways, consider adding the comment 'that light spillage from shop frontages should not adversely impact on residential amenity.
Page 96. 'Pavement Cafes' consider adding the point 'Pavement cafes should not be provided in locations where there will be an adverse impact on residential amenity'.
Page 97. 'Shelters and Compounds for Smokers' please consider adding the further point 'The shelters and compounds should not be provided where they will adversely impact on residential amenity.
Section 5: Check List page 101
Private Amenity Space:
Are the Amenity Spaces Located where they will not be adversely Impacted by Noise from Adjoining Sources such as Roads and Commercial/industrial premises.
Non Residential Schemes:
Page 102. Consider adding the comment 'Does the scheme have an adverse impact on residential amenity'.
6.3.12 Contaminated Land Assessment
440. Consider adding 'The assessment should have regard to the latest edition of the Essex Contaminated Land Consortium Guidance for applicants and developers'.
6.3.13 Noise Assessment
441. Consideration should be given to adding the term 'Detriment to amenity' in addition to noise nuisance. It is understood that avoidance of detriment to amenity is the standard to aim for as regards development subject to planning applications and that this is a higher standard than would be applied if the term nuisance is used.
442. Consider using the following wording 'A noise impact assessment should be submitted for all applications where noise impact on residential amenity may be consideration e.g for sites adjacent to a railway line, a main road, MOD testing area, commercial and industrial developments, and new sporting facilities'
Consider adding a further Section headed 'Artificial Lighting Assessment'. A lighting assessment would be required for developments that have the potential to cause adverse impact on residential amenity such as the flood lighting of sports pitches.
6.3.13 Noise Assessment
The comment for further details see PPG 24: Planning and Noise which can be viewed at www.communities.gov.uk and Environmental Health Guidance - Environmental Noise Impact Residential Developments needs amendment. Please delete 'Environmental Health Guidance - Environmental Noise Impact Residential Developments' and insert 'Guidance by regarding the content of noise impact assessments and criteria sought may be obtained from the Council's Environmental Protection Section via telephone number (01702) 215811.
6.3.17 Lighting Strategy
Please consider adding a comment that the lighting strategy should demonstrate that the proposals will not have an adverse impact on residental amenity.
On page 37 after last paragraph there is a referene to 'see also Environmental Health Guidance-Creation of Residential Dwellings'. I assume this document was produced by private sector housing (PSH), it is recommended that the PSH section is consulted to make sure this advice is current if this has not already been done.
Appendix 5: Code for Sustainable Homes Assessment Criteria
Under the issue 'Construction Site Impacts' in the assessment critera no mention is made of noise control. Suggest the following point is added:
....Adopt best practice policies in respect of noise control including hours of work.
Appendix 6: Options for Resource Minimisation and Development
Under the Option 'Live/work units' in the 'Comments' column consideration should be given to making the comment that only work activities with no impact on the amenity of adjoining residential units would be suitable for these type of units.
Appendix 7: Options for Renewable Power Generation Development
In the option column 'Small Wind Turbine' is noted. In the comments column consideration should be given to making the comment that noise and vibration issues should be considered in respect of the installation of these units.
It is noted that there is an option column referring to 'Wood pellet stoves and boilers'. In the comments column it is suggested that a comment is added regarding the location of the flue and the surroundings and the adequacy of the chimney height in relation to the potential for problems due to odour emissions.

Overall I would like to say that this is excellent document and the revisions that have been made add a lot of value however I have made a few suggested comments sorry for the delay in coming back to you:

Update of introduction in light of recently adopted policy and guidance - no comment
Cross links to the Core Strategy, East of England Regional Spatial Strategy and saved Borough Local Plan Policies - no comment
Improved guidance on
Scale, Height and Massing - could include a recognition that within streets there may be a character within individual street block ie chalkwell esplanade or a characteristic row of properties in a street ie where there is a run of bungalows in a street that is predominantly 2 storey semis.
Sustainable Development and Design - I could not see any where where it is emphasised that these options should be incorporated into the design and not left to be a condition, reference could be made to the local list and that this could be a reason to invalidate the application
The Historic Environment - no comments
Amenity Space - amenity decks and roof terraces - mention a common design solution to prevent overlooking from roof terraces is to set the boundary in from the edge of the roof which removes the need for unsightly obscure panels whilst retaining views of the townscape - the prevention of overlooking can effectively be shown using cross sections
Backland and Infill Development - no comments
Tall Buildings - could maybe add a comment about what you said at the 22 the Leas meeting about have the odd building in strategic locations breaking though the general height of buildings, direct reference could be made to the tall building locations identified within the Central Area Master Plan
Pavement Cafes - no comments
Space Standards including Lifetime Home Standards - this does not go so far as to state a standard for flat sizes (not room sizes) which I thought we were heading towards, maybe we could just adopt those as our standard, I know it is a common thought that the market should determine appropriate sizes however surely we could link the flat sizes to the delivery of a range of accommodation sizes which were identified in the background information that fed into the core strategy
How to Submit an Application - reference that the council's local lists provide further information as to when additional supporting documentation is required which can be found on the council's web site
2.3.2.1 Overshadowing - I think we need to make a commitment to a shadowing school of thought ie P J Littlefair's 'Site layout planning for daylight and sunlight a guide to good practice' as a method that the authority agrees to (this was the guy who came in to do the talk and is nationally renowned in this field)
2.3.4.5 Public Art - I think the word typically is not strong enough for the 1% contribution, it should be more like a 1% contribution will be required unless otherwise agreed with the Council
2.3.5.4 Conversions - houses into flats - Viv may want to look at strengthening this up as I think there is a general push to stop this outside of town centre areas, maybe can be achieved by referencing the Core Strategy
2.3.2.2 Overlooking and privacy - cross sections can be an effective tool to demonstrate overlooking is not possible the Council uses a height of 1.7 metres for eye lines
5.3.8 beach huts - roller shutters are not acceptable in any circumstance even where there is repeat vandalism. When I contacted a number of other authorities with beach huts they do not allow roller shutters as they look like garages. In speaking with colleges in building control they are satisfied that using better hinges and locks on the doors will be just as effective. Staining of beach huts is unacceptable and was accidently included in the first version of the design and townscape guide and should now be omitted. The colour of the beach huts must be vibrant pastels going further than just 'will be welcomed'. I know there are a lot of examples of pretty poor design including roller shutters and staining however over time as these are replaced (generally every 10-15 years) it will be possible to really improve there appearance.
4.5 conservation areas - I could not see it but did we mention about the window grants scheme the council offers - there should be a paragraph stating "Traditional windows are essential to the character of historic buildings and conservation areas. Many need repairing; others have been replaced by inappropriate designs. Window Grants are, therefore, available to help repair and reinstate traditional windows in Conservation Areas. Window Grants provide 40% of the cost of repairing and reinstating traditional windows in Conservation Areas. Grants are up to £500 per property and are restricted to traditional windows facing the street which contribute to the area's character. Grants are discretionary and will depend on funds being available when an application is made. Grant application forms are available from Enterprise, Tourism and the Environment, Southend-on-Sea Borough Council telephone 01702 215004 or can be downloaded from this page. Estimates from two contractors based on the same specification must be enclosed with the application. The offer of a grant is discretionary and will be subject to acceptable estimates and to funds being available. A grant cannot be offered for work that has already been started or carried out. If a grant is offered, it will be in writing and will be subject to appropriate conditions. Subject to agreement, work may be deferred for up to a year following a grant offer. Payment of a grant will normally be made after the work has been completed satisfactorily and receipted invoices have been submitted. Interim payments for larger projects may be made in some instances. Consent under planning legislation and the Building Regulations may be needed before work starts. The Council will advise and help you make any necessary application."
2.3.1.3 - internal arrangements and space standards - all habitable rooms 'must' not 'should' have natural ventilation and daylight

Overall I would like to say that this is excellent document and the revisions that have been made add a lot of value however I have made a few suggested comments sorry for the delay in coming back to you:

Update of introduction in light of recently adopted policy and guidance - no comment
Cross links to the Core Strategy, East of England Regional Spatial Strategy and saved Borough Local Plan Policies - no comment
Improved guidance on
Scale, Height and Massing - could include a recognition that within streets there may be a character within individual street block ie chalkwell esplanade or a characteristic row of properties in a street ie where there is a run of bungalows in a street that is predominantly 2 storey semis.
Sustainable Development and Design - I could not see any where where it is emphasised that these options should be incorporated into the design and not left to be a condition, reference could be made to the local list and that this could be a reason to invalidate the application
The Historic Environment - no comments
Amenity Space - amenity decks and roof terraces - mention a common design solution to prevent overlooking from roof terraces is to set the boundary in from the edge of the roof which removes the need for unsightly obscure panels whilst retaining views of the townscape - the prevention of overlooking can effectively be shown using cross sections
Backland and Infill Development - no comments
Tall Buildings - could maybe add a comment about what you said at the 22 the Leas meeting about have the odd building in strategic locations breaking though the general height of buildings, direct reference could be made to the tall building locations identified within the Central Area Master Plan
Pavement Cafes - no comments
Space Standards including Lifetime Home Standards - this does not go so far as to state a standard for flat sizes (not room sizes) which I thought we were heading towards, maybe we could just adopt those as our standard, I know it is a common thought that the market should determine appropriate sizes however surely we could link the flat sizes to the delivery of a range of accommodation sizes which were identified in the background information that fed into the core strategy
How to Submit an Application - reference that the council's local lists provide further information as to when additional supporting documentation is required which can be found on the council's web site
2.3.2.1 Overshadowing - I think we need to make a commitment to a shadowing school of thought ie P J Littlefair's 'Site layout planning for daylight and sunlight a guide to good practice' as a method that the authority agrees to (this was the guy who came in to do the talk and is nationally renowned in this field)
2.3.4.5 Public Art - I think the word typically is not strong enough for the 1% contribution, it should be more like a 1% contribution will be required unless otherwise agreed with the Council
2.3.5.4 Conversions - houses into flats - Viv may want to look at strengthening this up as I think there is a general push to stop this outside of town centre areas, maybe can be achieved by referencing the Core Strategy
2.3.2.2 Overlooking and privacy - cross sections can be an effective tool to demonstrate overlooking is not possible the Council uses a height of 1.7 metres for eye lines
5.3.8 beach huts - roller shutters are not acceptable in any circumstance even where there is repeat vandalism. When I contacted a number of other authorities with beach huts they do not allow roller shutters as they look like garages. In speaking with colleges in building control they are satisfied that using better hinges and locks on the doors will be just as effective. Staining of beach huts is unacceptable and was accidently included in the first version of the design and townscape guide and should now be omitted. The colour of the beach huts must be vibrant pastels going further than just 'will be welcomed'. I know there are a lot of examples of pretty poor design including roller shutters and staining however over time as these are replaced (generally every 10-15 years) it will be possible to really improve there appearance.
4.5 conservation areas - I could not see it but did we mention about the window grants scheme the council offers - there should be a paragraph stating "Traditional windows are essential to the character of historic buildings and conservation areas. Many need repairing; others have been replaced by inappropriate designs. Window Grants are, therefore, available to help repair and reinstate traditional windows in Conservation Areas. Window Grants provide 40% of the cost of repairing and reinstating traditional windows in Conservation Areas. Grants are up to £500 per property and are restricted to traditional windows facing the street which contribute to the area's character. Grants are discretionary and will depend on funds being available when an application is made. Grant application forms are available from Enterprise, Tourism and the Environment, Southend-on-Sea Borough Council telephone 01702 215004 or can be downloaded from this page. Estimates from two contractors based on the same specification must be enclosed with the application. The offer of a grant is discretionary and will be subject to acceptable estimates and to funds being available. A grant cannot be offered for work that has already been started or carried out. If a grant is offered, it will be in writing and will be subject to appropriate conditions. Subject to agreement, work may be deferred for up to a year following a grant offer. Payment of a grant will normally be made after the work has been completed satisfactorily and receipted invoices have been submitted. Interim payments for larger projects may be made in some instances. Consent under planning legislation and the Building Regulations may be needed before work starts. The Council will advise and help you make any necessary application."
2.3.1.3 - internal arrangements and space standards - all habitable rooms 'must' not 'should' have natural ventilation and daylight

Overall I would like to say that this is excellent document and the revisions that have been made add a lot of value however I have made a few suggested comments sorry for the delay in coming back to you:

Update of introduction in light of recently adopted policy and guidance - no comment
Cross links to the Core Strategy, East of England Regional Spatial Strategy and saved Borough Local Plan Policies - no comment
Improved guidance on
Scale, Height and Massing - could include a recognition that within streets there may be a character within individual street block ie chalkwell esplanade or a characteristic row of properties in a street ie where there is a run of bungalows in a street that is predominantly 2 storey semis.
Sustainable Development and Design - I could not see any where where it is emphasised that these options should be incorporated into the design and not left to be a condition, reference could be made to the local list and that this could be a reason to invalidate the application
The Historic Environment - no comments
Amenity Space - amenity decks and roof terraces - mention a common design solution to prevent overlooking from roof terraces is to set the boundary in from the edge of the roof which removes the need for unsightly obscure panels whilst retaining views of the townscape - the prevention of overlooking can effectively be shown using cross sections
Backland and Infill Development - no comments
Tall Buildings - could maybe add a comment about what you said at the 22 the Leas meeting about have the odd building in strategic locations breaking though the general height of buildings, direct reference could be made to the tall building locations identified within the Central Area Master Plan
Pavement Cafes - no comments
Space Standards including Lifetime Home Standards - this does not go so far as to state a standard for flat sizes (not room sizes) which I thought we were heading towards, maybe we could just adopt those as our standard, I know it is a common thought that the market should determine appropriate sizes however surely we could link the flat sizes to the delivery of a range of accommodation sizes which were identified in the background information that fed into the core strategy
How to Submit an Application - reference that the council's local lists provide further information as to when additional supporting documentation is required which can be found on the council's web site
2.3.2.1 Overshadowing - I think we need to make a commitment to a shadowing school of thought ie P J Littlefair's 'Site layout planning for daylight and sunlight a guide to good practice' as a method that the authority agrees to (this was the guy who came in to do the talk and is nationally renowned in this field)
2.3.4.5 Public Art - I think the word typically is not strong enough for the 1% contribution, it should be more like a 1% contribution will be required unless otherwise agreed with the Council
2.3.5.4 Conversions - houses into flats - Viv may want to look at strengthening this up as I think there is a general push to stop this outside of town centre areas, maybe can be achieved by referencing the Core Strategy
2.3.2.2 Overlooking and privacy - cross sections can be an effective tool to demonstrate overlooking is not possible the Council uses a height of 1.7 metres for eye lines
5.3.8 beach huts - roller shutters are not acceptable in any circumstance even where there is repeat vandalism. When I contacted a number of other authorities with beach huts they do not allow roller shutters as they look like garages. In speaking with colleges in building control they are satisfied that using better hinges and locks on the doors will be just as effective. Staining of beach huts is unacceptable and was accidently included in the first version of the design and townscape guide and should now be omitted. The colour of the beach huts must be vibrant pastels going further than just 'will be welcomed'. I know there are a lot of examples of pretty poor design including roller shutters and staining however over time as these are replaced (generally every 10-15 years) it will be possible to really improve there appearance.
4.5 conservation areas - I could not see it but did we mention about the window grants scheme the council offers - there should be a paragraph stating "Traditional windows are essential to the character of historic buildings and conservation areas. Many need repairing; others have been replaced by inappropriate designs. Window Grants are, therefore, available to help repair and reinstate traditional windows in Conservation Areas. Window Grants provide 40% of the cost of repairing and reinstating traditional windows in Conservation Areas. Grants are up to £500 per property and are restricted to traditional windows facing the street which contribute to the area's character. Grants are discretionary and will depend on funds being available when an application is made. Grant application forms are available from Enterprise, Tourism and the Environment, Southend-on-Sea Borough Council telephone 01702 215004 or can be downloaded from this page. Estimates from two contractors based on the same specification must be enclosed with the application. The offer of a grant is discretionary and will be subject to acceptable estimates and to funds being available. A grant cannot be offered for work that has already been started or carried out. If a grant is offered, it will be in writing and will be subject to appropriate conditions. Subject to agreement, work may be deferred for up to a year following a grant offer. Payment of a grant will normally be made after the work has been completed satisfactorily and receipted invoices have been submitted. Interim payments for larger projects may be made in some instances. Consent under planning legislation and the Building Regulations may be needed before work starts. The Council will advise and help you make any necessary application."
2.3.1.3 - internal arrangements and space standards - all habitable rooms 'must' not 'should' have natural ventilation and daylight

Overall I would like to say that this is excellent document and the revisions that have been made add a lot of value however I have made a few suggested comments sorry for the delay in coming back to you:

Update of introduction in light of recently adopted policy and guidance - no comment
Cross links to the Core Strategy, East of England Regional Spatial Strategy and saved Borough Local Plan Policies - no comment
Improved guidance on
Scale, Height and Massing - could include a recognition that within streets there may be a character within individual street block ie chalkwell esplanade or a characteristic row of properties in a street ie where there is a run of bungalows in a street that is predominantly 2 storey semis.
Sustainable Development and Design - I could not see any where where it is emphasised that these options should be incorporated into the design and not left to be a condition, reference could be made to the local list and that this could be a reason to invalidate the application
The Historic Environment - no comments
Amenity Space - amenity decks and roof terraces - mention a common design solution to prevent overlooking from roof terraces is to set the boundary in from the edge of the roof which removes the need for unsightly obscure panels whilst retaining views of the townscape - the prevention of overlooking can effectively be shown using cross sections
Backland and Infill Development - no comments
Tall Buildings - could maybe add a comment about what you said at the 22 the Leas meeting about have the odd building in strategic locations breaking though the general height of buildings, direct reference could be made to the tall building locations identified within the Central Area Master Plan
Pavement Cafes - no comments
Space Standards including Lifetime Home Standards - this does not go so far as to state a standard for flat sizes (not room sizes) which I thought we were heading towards, maybe we could just adopt those as our standard, I know it is a common thought that the market should determine appropriate sizes however surely we could link the flat sizes to the delivery of a range of accommodation sizes which were identified in the background information that fed into the core strategy
How to Submit an Application - reference that the council's local lists provide further information as to when additional supporting documentation is required which can be found on the council's web site
2.3.2.1 Overshadowing - I think we need to make a commitment to a shadowing school of thought ie P J Littlefair's 'Site layout planning for daylight and sunlight a guide to good practice' as a method that the authority agrees to (this was the guy who came in to do the talk and is nationally renowned in this field)
2.3.4.5 Public Art - I think the word typically is not strong enough for the 1% contribution, it should be more like a 1% contribution will be required unless otherwise agreed with the Council
2.3.5.4 Conversions - houses into flats - Viv may want to look at strengthening this up as I think there is a general push to stop this outside of town centre areas, maybe can be achieved by referencing the Core Strategy
2.3.2.2 Overlooking and privacy - cross sections can be an effective tool to demonstrate overlooking is not possible the Council uses a height of 1.7 metres for eye lines
5.3.8 beach huts - roller shutters are not acceptable in any circumstance even where there is repeat vandalism. When I contacted a number of other authorities with beach huts they do not allow roller shutters as they look like garages. In speaking with colleges in building control they are satisfied that using better hinges and locks on the doors will be just as effective. Staining of beach huts is unacceptable and was accidently included in the first version of the design and townscape guide and should now be omitted. The colour of the beach huts must be vibrant pastels going further than just 'will be welcomed'. I know there are a lot of examples of pretty poor design including roller shutters and staining however over time as these are replaced (generally every 10-15 years) it will be possible to really improve there appearance.
4.5 conservation areas - I could not see it but did we mention about the window grants scheme the council offers - there should be a paragraph stating "Traditional windows are essential to the character of historic buildings and conservation areas. Many need repairing; others have been replaced by inappropriate designs. Window Grants are, therefore, available to help repair and reinstate traditional windows in Conservation Areas. Window Grants provide 40% of the cost of repairing and reinstating traditional windows in Conservation Areas. Grants are up to £500 per property and are restricted to traditional windows facing the street which contribute to the area's character. Grants are discretionary and will depend on funds being available when an application is made. Grant application forms are available from Enterprise, Tourism and the Environment, Southend-on-Sea Borough Council telephone 01702 215004 or can be downloaded from this page. Estimates from two contractors based on the same specification must be enclosed with the application. The offer of a grant is discretionary and will be subject to acceptable estimates and to funds being available. A grant cannot be offered for work that has already been started or carried out. If a grant is offered, it will be in writing and will be subject to appropriate conditions. Subject to agreement, work may be deferred for up to a year following a grant offer. Payment of a grant will normally be made after the work has been completed satisfactorily and receipted invoices have been submitted. Interim payments for larger projects may be made in some instances. Consent under planning legislation and the Building Regulations may be needed before work starts. The Council will advise and help you make any necessary application."
2.3.1.3 - internal arrangements and space standards - all habitable rooms 'must' not 'should' have natural ventilation and daylight

Overall I would like to say that this is excellent document and the revisions that have been made add a lot of value however I have made a few suggested comments sorry for the delay in coming back to you:

Update of introduction in light of recently adopted policy and guidance - no comment
Cross links to the Core Strategy, East of England Regional Spatial Strategy and saved Borough Local Plan Policies - no comment
Improved guidance on
Scale, Height and Massing - could include a recognition that within streets there may be a character within individual street block ie chalkwell esplanade or a characteristic row of properties in a street ie where there is a run of bungalows in a street that is predominantly 2 storey semis.
Sustainable Development and Design - I could not see any where where it is emphasised that these options should be incorporated into the design and not left to be a condition, reference could be made to the local list and that this could be a reason to invalidate the application
The Historic Environment - no comments
Amenity Space - amenity decks and roof terraces - mention a common design solution to prevent overlooking from roof terraces is to set the boundary in from the edge of the roof which removes the need for unsightly obscure panels whilst retaining views of the townscape - the prevention of overlooking can effectively be shown using cross sections
Backland and Infill Development - no comments
Tall Buildings - could maybe add a comment about what you said at the 22 the Leas meeting about have the odd building in strategic locations breaking though the general height of buildings, direct reference could be made to the tall building locations identified within the Central Area Master Plan
Pavement Cafes - no comments
Space Standards including Lifetime Home Standards - this does not go so far as to state a standard for flat sizes (not room sizes) which I thought we were heading towards, maybe we could just adopt those as our standard, I know it is a common thought that the market should determine appropriate sizes however surely we could link the flat sizes to the delivery of a range of accommodation sizes which were identified in the background information that fed into the core strategy
How to Submit an Application - reference that the council's local lists provide further information as to when additional supporting documentation is required which can be found on the council's web site
2.3.2.1 Overshadowing - I think we need to make a commitment to a shadowing school of thought ie P J Littlefair's 'Site layout planning for daylight and sunlight a guide to good practice' as a method that the authority agrees to (this was the guy who came in to do the talk and is nationally renowned in this field)
2.3.4.5 Public Art - I think the word typically is not strong enough for the 1% contribution, it should be more like a 1% contribution will be required unless otherwise agreed with the Council
2.3.5.4 Conversions - houses into flats - Viv may want to look at strengthening this up as I think there is a general push to stop this outside of town centre areas, maybe can be achieved by referencing the Core Strategy
2.3.2.2 Overlooking and privacy - cross sections can be an effective tool to demonstrate overlooking is not possible the Council uses a height of 1.7 metres for eye lines
5.3.8 beach huts - roller shutters are not acceptable in any circumstance even where there is repeat vandalism. When I contacted a number of other authorities with beach huts they do not allow roller shutters as they look like garages. In speaking with colleges in building control they are satisfied that using better hinges and locks on the doors will be just as effective. Staining of beach huts is unacceptable and was accidently included in the first version of the design and townscape guide and should now be omitted. The colour of the beach huts must be vibrant pastels going further than just 'will be welcomed'. I know there are a lot of examples of pretty poor design including roller shutters and staining however over time as these are replaced (generally every 10-15 years) it will be possible to really improve there appearance.
4.5 conservation areas - I could not see it but did we mention about the window grants scheme the council offers - there should be a paragraph stating "Traditional windows are essential to the character of historic buildings and conservation areas. Many need repairing; others have been replaced by inappropriate designs. Window Grants are, therefore, available to help repair and reinstate traditional windows in Conservation Areas. Window Grants provide 40% of the cost of repairing and reinstating traditional windows in Conservation Areas. Grants are up to £500 per property and are restricted to traditional windows facing the street which contribute to the area's character. Grants are discretionary and will depend on funds being available when an application is made. Grant application forms are available from Enterprise, Tourism and the Environment, Southend-on-Sea Borough Council telephone 01702 215004 or can be downloaded from this page. Estimates from two contractors based on the same specification must be enclosed with the application. The offer of a grant is discretionary and will be subject to acceptable estimates and to funds being available. A grant cannot be offered for work that has already been started or carried out. If a grant is offered, it will be in writing and will be subject to appropriate conditions. Subject to agreement, work may be deferred for up to a year following a grant offer. Payment of a grant will normally be made after the work has been completed satisfactorily and receipted invoices have been submitted. Interim payments for larger projects may be made in some instances. Consent under planning legislation and the Building Regulations may be needed before work starts. The Council will advise and help you make any necessary application."
2.3.1.3 - internal arrangements and space standards - all habitable rooms 'must' not 'should' have natural ventilation and daylight