Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Search representations
Results for National Federation for the Blind search
New searchComment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 21: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the London Road Policy Area? Please explain your answer. If you consider that the timescale for delivering OS15 shou
Representation ID: 2437
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
Victoria Gateway should be made safe by installing a pedestrian crossing across the shared space outside the Victoria Railway station.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 20: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the High Street Policy Area? Please explain your answer. If you consider that the timescales for delivering developm
Representation ID: 2438
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
The High street should be kept at one level.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 21: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the London Road Policy Area? Please explain your answer. If you consider that the timescale for delivering OS15 shou
Representation ID: 2439
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
London Road should not be pedestrianised. The taxi rank should not be moved further away from its current position. It is already quite a distance for elderly and disabled people to walk from the shops to the taxi rank. People visiting the cinema also need the taxi nearby. At night it could cause dangerous situations if people have to walk further to the taxi rank. I would even suggest a bus route to that area, certainly not a pedestrian area. There are many banks in that area where many elderly people need to go, and for safety reasons need taxis close by for their transport requirements. Also more disabled parking to be in that area. If you pedestrianise it you take away access for disabled people to get to their Banks.
If you put tables and chairs in a pedestrian area in London Road this will be a nightmare for blind and partially sighted people to walk in this area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 21: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the London Road Policy Area? Please explain your answer. If you consider that the timescale for delivering OS15 shou
Representation ID: 2440
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
Throughout the document there are references to pedestrian and cycling routes. Cycling routes should be built on road space and not on pavements. At no time should pedestrians have to share with cyclists. It is too dangerous and will prevent many people who are blind and partially sighted from walking out safely. Cycling should not be allowed in the high street or any other pedestrian area.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 21: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the London Road Policy Area? Please explain your answer. If you consider that the timescale for delivering OS15 shou
Representation ID: 2441
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
The direct Link from Victoria railway station and the high street can only happen if a safe pedestrian crossing is installed across the shared space outside the station.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 22: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Elmer Square Policy Area and Opportunity Site 3: Elmer Square? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2442
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
The Forum is not accessible for many elderly people like it was when it was in Victoria avenue. It is not on a bus route and it is a long walk for many people to reach it from a bus stop. There should be taxi ranks and parking for disabled people next to the forum.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 22: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Elmer Square Policy Area and Opportunity Site 3: Elmer Square? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2443
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
There is mention of mixed pedestrian and cycling routes that should not be allowed on the grounds of safety as already mentioned above.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 24:Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Warrior Square Policy Area and Opportunity Site 5: Warrior Square? Please explain your answer
Representation ID: 2444
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
Pedestrian and cycle routes should be kept separate.
No cycling should be allowed on the footway or footpath.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 25: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Clifftown Policy Area? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2445
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
All bus routes should be kept in this area with shelters and seating provided.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 24:Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Warrior Square Policy Area and Opportunity Site 5: Warrior Square? Please explain your answer
Representation ID: 2446
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
This is a suitable area for a day centre for disabled people. Since the Queensway building was closed there has been nowhere for disabled people to go.