Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Search representations
Results for National Federation for the Blind search
New searchComment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 24:Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Warrior Square Policy Area and Opportunity Site 5: Warrior Square? Please explain your answer
Representation ID: 2447
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
There is no longer a swimming pool in the centre of the Town as the Warrior Square pool was closed. A new facility should be provided in this central area.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 25: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Clifftown Policy Area? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2448
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
It is not clear about the plan for outside the Central railway Station. Taxi ranks need to be kept and bus routes need to improve in this area to encourage more people to travel to the station and High street by bus and not use their cars.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 25: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Clifftown Policy Area? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2449
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
What is a public square? I do not agree with outside dining unless tables and chairs are properly guarded by a metre high barrier to prevent blind and partially sighted people walking in to them
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 25: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Clifftown Policy Area? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2450
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
Again pedestrian and cycle routes are suggested these must be kept separate. Cyclists should be on road space and not pedestrian areas.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 26: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Tylers Policy Area and Opportunity Site 6: Tylers Avenue? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2451
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
A new travel centre should be covered completely. It would be better located next to Victoria railway station on the old B&Q site, jf not next to the Central railway station. In most towns this happens. Buses would not then hold up the traffic near to the Royals.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 26: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Tylers Policy Area and Opportunity Site 6: Tylers Avenue? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2452
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
What is the public square you refer to? We certainly do not want a shared space like at Victoria Gateway and City Beach. Why are railings to be removed at crossing points? This will cause danger for all pedestrians including children.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 26: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Tylers Policy Area and Opportunity Site 6: Tylers Avenue? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2453
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
Cycle routes must be on road space and not on footpaths or footways. Pedestrians must have uncluttered walk ways with safe pedestrian crossings at all junctions, with audible signals and tactile markings
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 27: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Central Seafront Policy Area and sites OS7, OS8, OS9 and CS1.1? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2454
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
Up to 1970 we had a direct bus route from Southend Victoria Railway station down the High street, down Pier Hill to and along the sea front. Unfortunately engineers of the day ignored our access committee and went along with their plans of pedestrianising the high street and cutting off the sea front from the high street restricting hundreds of people getting to the shops by bus.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 27: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Central Seafront Policy Area and sites OS7, OS8, OS9 and CS1.1? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2455
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
OS8 - Spanish steps will certainly stop many disabled people from getting to the sea front. Spanish steps are not accessible and should not be used.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 27: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Central Seafront Policy Area and sites OS7, OS8, OS9 and CS1.1? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2456
Received: 01/03/2016
Respondent: National Federation for the Blind
The City Beach scheme was built without proper consultation and did not take into account the needs of disabled people. The Courtesy crossings are not legal crossings and cannot be used safely by blind people. The whole area should be reinstated to a proper road with kerbs and proper pedestrian crossings, with audible signals and tactile markings. The City Beach scheme should not be extended.